MEDIA

ORAL ARGUMENT ON JUNE 5, 2009, BEFORE JUSTICES ROVNER, MANION, AND TINDER OF THE 7TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN PARRA, et al. v. NEAL, et al., 09-1404: Attorney Mondragón argued that ballots lawfully cast during the early-voting period for Ambrosio Medrano, a candidate to the Office of Alderman of Chicago's 25th Ward in the 2007 Municipal General Election, should have been counted in the final tally because they were cast before the Illinois Supreme Court knocked Ambrosio Medrano off of the ballot at the 11th-hour and because they would have forced the incumbent into a runoff election.
​
ORAL ARGUMENT ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2009, BEFORE JUSTICES EASTERBROOK, BAUER, AND EVANS OF THE 7TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN LAKE v. NEAL, et al., 08-3765: Attorney Mondragón argued that personal information procured by the Secretary of State pursuant to the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) pertains to a motor vehicle record and is, therefore, protected by the Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA).  
 
Joravsky, B. (Feb. 3, 2011). Sic 'Em: The Flavor of the Month in Election-Law Jobbery is the Cinkus Violation. Chicago Reader.

Gallardo, M. (Nov. 5, 2019). Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez files complaint, argues former Ald. Daniel Solis improperly used campaign money for legal costs. ABC Chicago.

Dukmasova, M. (Jan. 29, 2020). Objection! Who needs Facebook and Russian trolls when Illinois election laws sow plenty of bad faith? Chicago Reader.

Hinton, R. (May 19, 2021). $8 million is enough? Alderman seeks ban on Madigan, Burke, Solis using 'obscene amounts' of campaign cash to pay lawyers. Chi Sun-Times.